🔗 Share this article

These times present a very distinctive occurrence: the first-ever US parade of the caretakers. They vary in their expertise and traits, but they all share the identical goal – to stop an Israeli breach, or even devastation, of Gaza’s unstable peace agreement. After the war concluded, there have been rare occasions without at least one of the former president's envoys on the ground. Just recently saw the presence of Jared Kushner, a businessman, JD Vance and a political figure – all coming to carry out their duties.

Israel engages them fully. In just a few days it launched a set of strikes in Gaza after the loss of a pair of Israeli military personnel – resulting, according to reports, in dozens of Palestinian casualties. A number of officials demanded a resumption of the war, and the Knesset enacted a early decision to incorporate the West Bank. The US stance was somehow between “no” and “hell no.”

But in several ways, the Trump administration appears more focused on preserving the existing, unstable period of the peace than on progressing to the subsequent: the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip. When it comes to that, it appears the US may have ambitions but few concrete plans.

At present, it remains uncertain at what point the proposed international administrative entity will effectively begin operating, and the same goes for the designated peacekeeping troops – or even the identity of its soldiers. On Tuesday, a US official stated the United States would not impose the structure of the foreign unit on Israel. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet persists to reject various proposals – as it did with the Ankara's offer this week – what follows? There is also the opposite issue: which party will decide whether the units preferred by the Israelis are even prepared in the assignment?

The issue of the duration it will require to disarm Hamas is equally unclear. “Our hope in the government is that the global peacekeeping unit is intends to at this point assume responsibility in neutralizing Hamas,” stated the official lately. “That’s will require a while.” Trump further reinforced the ambiguity, declaring in an discussion on Sunday that there is no “rigid” schedule for the group to lay down arms. So, theoretically, the unnamed participants of this not yet established international contingent could enter Gaza while the organization's militants still hold power. Would they be confronting a leadership or a guerrilla movement? Among the many of the concerns surfacing. Others might wonder what the verdict will be for average residents as things stand, with the group persisting to focus on its own opponents and opposition.

Recent developments have yet again emphasized the omissions of Israeli media coverage on each side of the Gazan frontier. Every outlet attempts to examine each potential angle of Hamas’s breaches of the peace. And, in general, the fact that Hamas has been stalling the return of the remains of deceased Israeli captives has taken over the news.

Conversely, reporting of civilian casualties in the region caused by Israeli strikes has garnered little notice – if any. Take the Israeli retaliatory strikes in the wake of Sunday’s southern Gaza event, in which two military personnel were fatally wounded. While Gaza’s authorities claimed dozens of casualties, Israeli television pundits questioned the “moderate reaction,” which focused on just infrastructure.

That is nothing new. Over the recent weekend, the press agency accused Israeli forces of violating the ceasefire with the group multiple times since the ceasefire was implemented, resulting in the loss of 38 individuals and wounding another many more. The claim seemed unimportant to most Israeli reporting – it was simply ignored. Even reports that eleven members of a Palestinian household were fatally shot by Israeli troops last Friday.

Gaza’s civil defence agency reported the individuals had been seeking to go back to their home in the Zeitoun area of Gaza City when the vehicle they were in was fired upon for allegedly crossing the “boundary” that defines areas under Israeli army control. That yellow line is invisible to the naked eye and is visible only on plans and in government records – not always available to average residents in the area.

Yet that incident hardly received a note in Israeli news outlets. One source covered it shortly on its online platform, quoting an Israeli military spokesperson who said that after a suspicious transport was identified, soldiers fired alerting fire towards it, “but the car continued to advance on the troops in a manner that caused an immediate threat to them. The troops shot to eliminate the risk, in accordance with the ceasefire.” No fatalities were claimed.

Amid such narrative, it is understandable numerous Israeli citizens feel Hamas exclusively is to blame for violating the truce. That perception could lead to prompting demands for a stronger stance in Gaza.

Sooner or later – maybe sooner rather than later – it will not be enough for US envoys to take on the role of kindergarten teachers, advising the Israeli government what not to do. They will {have to|need